Based on 2004 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Google Analytics | Hostinger CDN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 66 | Hostinger CDN |
| Accessibility | 87 | 96 | Hostinger CDN |
| Best Practices | 86 | 100 | Hostinger CDN |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Hostinger CDN |
| Security | 65 | 80 | Hostinger CDN |
| TTFB | 413ms | 262ms | Hostinger CDN |
| Composite | 73 | 83 | Hostinger CDN |
Hostinger CDN outperforms Google Analytics in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in no categories.
Google Analytics doesn't clearly lead Hostinger CDN in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Hostinger CDN when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2004 audited Google Analytics sites and 1 audited Hostinger CDN sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback