Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Howler.js

Based on 2089 and 12 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Howler.js details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsHowler.jsWinner
Performance4240Google Analytics
Accessibility8787Tie
Best Practices8686Tie
SEO9192Howler.js
Security6666Tie
TTFB421ms435msGoogle Analytics
Composite7374Howler.js
Performance
Google Analytics
42
Howler.js
40
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Howler.js
87
Security
Google Analytics
66
Howler.js
66
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Howler.js
92
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Howler.js
74

Google Analytics and Howler.js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Google Analytics has a composite score of 73 while Howler.js scores 74.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Howler.js

Choose Howler.js when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2089 audited Google Analytics sites and 12 audited Howler.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Howler.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Howler.js?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Howler.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Howler.js?
Howler.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Howler.js?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (421 ms vs 435 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Howler.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback