Based on 1936 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Google Analytics | Infinite Scroll | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 41 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 87 | 72 | Google Analytics |
| Best Practices | 85 | 96 | Infinite Scroll |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Infinite Scroll |
| Security | 65 | 61 | Google Analytics |
| TTFB | 406ms | 994ms | Google Analytics |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Google Analytics outperforms Infinite Scroll in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Infinite Scroll leads in best practices, SEO.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Infinite Scroll when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1936 audited Google Analytics sites and 1 audited Infinite Scroll sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback