Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Joomla

Based on 1989 and 16 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Joomla details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsJoomlaWinner
Performance4160Joomla
Accessibility8784Google Analytics
Best Practices8690Joomla
SEO9191Tie
Security6570Joomla
TTFB425ms426msGoogle Analytics
Composite7376Joomla
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Joomla
60
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Joomla
84
Security
Google Analytics
65
Joomla
70
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Joomla
91
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Joomla
76

Joomla outperforms Google Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is accessibility and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Joomla

Choose Joomla when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1989 audited Google Analytics sites and 16 audited Joomla sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Joomla?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Joomla sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (60 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Joomla?
Joomla sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Joomla?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Joomla?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Joomla?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (425 ms vs 426 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Joomla for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Joomla scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback