Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Joomla

Based on 2116 and 20 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Joomla details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsJoomlaWinner
Performance4260Joomla
Accessibility8784Google Analytics
Best Practices8691Joomla
SEO9192Joomla
Security6671Joomla
TTFB428ms633msGoogle Analytics
Composite7477Joomla
Performance
Google Analytics
42
Joomla
60
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Joomla
84
Security
Google Analytics
66
Joomla
71
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Joomla
92
Composite
Google Analytics
74
Joomla
77

Joomla outperforms Google Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). Google Analytics leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Joomla

Choose Joomla when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2116 audited Google Analytics sites and 20 audited Joomla sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Joomla?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Joomla sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (60 vs 42 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Joomla?
Joomla sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Joomla?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Joomla?
Joomla sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Joomla?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (428 ms vs 633 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Joomla for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Joomla scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback