Based on 2116 and 5 real audits
| Metric | Google Analytics | Kendo UI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 26 | Google Analytics |
| Accessibility | 87 | 89 | Kendo UI |
| Best Practices | 86 | 85 | Google Analytics |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | Google Analytics |
| Security | 66 | 67 | Kendo UI |
| TTFB | 428ms | 479ms | Google Analytics |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Google Analytics |
Google Analytics outperforms Kendo UI in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Kendo UI leads in accessibility, security.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Kendo UI when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2116 audited Google Analytics sites and 5 audited Kendo UI sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback