Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Linode/Akamai

Based on 1906 and 5 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Linode/Akamai details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsLinode/AkamaiWinner
Performance4169Linode/Akamai
Accessibility8776Google Analytics
Best Practices8593Linode/Akamai
SEO9191Tie
Security6463Google Analytics
TTFB401ms600msGoogle Analytics
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Linode/Akamai
69
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Linode/Akamai
76
Security
Google Analytics
64
Linode/Akamai
63
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Linode/Akamai
91
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Linode/Akamai
73

Google Analytics outperforms Linode/Akamai in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Linode/Akamai leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Linode/Akamai

Choose Linode/Akamai when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1906 audited Google Analytics sites and 5 audited Linode/Akamai sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Linode/Akamai?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Linode/Akamai sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (69 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Linode/Akamai?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Linode/Akamai?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 76). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Linode/Akamai?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Linode/Akamai?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (401 ms vs 600 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Linode/Akamai for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Linode/Akamai scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback