Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Lozad.js

Based on 2374 and 17 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Lozad.js details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsLozad.jsWinner
Performance4239Google Analytics
Accessibility8784Google Analytics
Best Practices8784Google Analytics
SEO9287Google Analytics
Security6768Lozad.js
TTFB455ms424msLozad.js
Composite7473Google Analytics
Performance
Google Analytics
42
Lozad.js
39
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Lozad.js
84
Security
Google Analytics
67
Lozad.js
68
SEO
Google Analytics
92
Lozad.js
87
Composite
Google Analytics
74
Lozad.js
73

Google Analytics outperforms Lozad.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Lozad.js leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Lozad.js

Choose Lozad.js when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2374 audited Google Analytics sites and 17 audited Lozad.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Lozad.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Lozad.js?
Lozad.js sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Lozad.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Lozad.js?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Lozad.js?
Lozad.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (424 ms vs 455 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Lozad.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback