Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Lucky Orange

Based on 2086 and 3 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Lucky Orange details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsLucky OrangeWinner
Performance4233Google Analytics
Accessibility8786Google Analytics
Best Practices8672Google Analytics
SEO9189Google Analytics
Security6677Lucky Orange
TTFB421ms214msLucky Orange
Composite7376Lucky Orange
Performance
Google Analytics
42
Lucky Orange
33
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Lucky Orange
86
Security
Google Analytics
66
Lucky Orange
77
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Lucky Orange
89
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Lucky Orange
76

Google Analytics outperforms Lucky Orange in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 76). Lucky Orange leads in security, TTFB, composite score.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Lucky Orange

Choose Lucky Orange when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2086 audited Google Analytics sites and 3 audited Lucky Orange sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Lucky Orange?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Lucky Orange?
Lucky Orange sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Lucky Orange?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Lucky Orange?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Lucky Orange?
Lucky Orange sites show lower Time to First Byte (214 ms vs 421 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Lucky Orange for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback