Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Microsoft

Based on 1890 and 2412 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Microsoft details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsMicrosoftWinner
Performance4139Google Analytics
Accessibility8789Microsoft
Best Practices8586Microsoft
SEO9189Google Analytics
Security6466Microsoft
TTFB400ms329msMicrosoft
Composite7372Google Analytics
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Microsoft
89
Security
Google Analytics
64
Microsoft
66
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Microsoft
89
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Microsoft
72

Microsoft outperforms Google Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in performance, SEO, composite score.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1890 audited Google Analytics sites and 2412 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Microsoft?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (329 ms vs 400 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback