Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Microsoft Clarity

Based on 2272 and 387 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Microsoft Clarity details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityWinner
Performance4234Google Analytics
Accessibility8790Microsoft Clarity
Best Practices8684Google Analytics
SEO9292Tie
Security6766Google Analytics
TTFB441ms422msMicrosoft Clarity
Composite7473Google Analytics
Performance
Google Analytics
42
Microsoft Clarity
34
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Microsoft Clarity
90
Security
Google Analytics
67
Microsoft Clarity
66
SEO
Google Analytics
92
Microsoft Clarity
92
Composite
Google Analytics
74
Microsoft Clarity
73

Google Analytics outperforms Microsoft Clarity in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Microsoft Clarity leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft Clarity

Choose Microsoft Clarity when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2272 audited Google Analytics sites and 387 audited Microsoft Clarity sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Microsoft Clarity?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 34 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Microsoft Clarity?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Microsoft Clarity?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft Clarity (90 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Microsoft Clarity?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Microsoft Clarity?
Microsoft Clarity sites show lower Time to First Byte (422 ms vs 441 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Microsoft Clarity for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback