Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Microsoft IIS

Based on 2004 and 66 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Microsoft IIS details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsMicrosoft IISWinner
Performance4145Microsoft IIS
Accessibility8787Tie
Best Practices8684Google Analytics
SEO9190Google Analytics
Security6566Microsoft IIS
TTFB413ms513msGoogle Analytics
Composite7372Google Analytics
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Microsoft IIS
45
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Microsoft IIS
87
Security
Google Analytics
65
Microsoft IIS
66
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Microsoft IIS
90
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Microsoft IIS
72

Google Analytics outperforms Microsoft IIS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Microsoft IIS leads in performance, security.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft IIS

Choose Microsoft IIS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2004 audited Google Analytics sites and 66 audited Microsoft IIS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Microsoft IIS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft IIS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Microsoft IIS?
Microsoft IIS sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Microsoft IIS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Microsoft IIS?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Microsoft IIS?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (413 ms vs 513 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Microsoft IIS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft IIS scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback