Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Mimecast

Based on 1905 and 145 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Mimecast details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsMimecastWinner
Performance4138Google Analytics
Accessibility8790Mimecast
Best Practices8587Mimecast
SEO9186Google Analytics
Security6466Mimecast
TTFB401ms255msMimecast
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Mimecast
38
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Mimecast
90
Security
Google Analytics
64
Mimecast
66
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Mimecast
86
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Mimecast
73

Mimecast outperforms Google Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in performance, SEO.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Mimecast

Choose Mimecast when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1905 audited Google Analytics sites and 145 audited Mimecast sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Mimecast?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Mimecast?
Mimecast sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Mimecast?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Mimecast (90 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Mimecast?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 86 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Mimecast?
Mimecast sites show lower Time to First Byte (255 ms vs 401 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Mimecast for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback