Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Mimecast

Based on 2290 and 148 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Mimecast details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsMimecastWinner
Performance4238Google Analytics
Accessibility8789Mimecast
Best Practices8687Mimecast
SEO9286Google Analytics
Security6766Google Analytics
TTFB439ms263msMimecast
Composite7473Google Analytics
Performance
Google Analytics
42
Mimecast
38
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Mimecast
89
Security
Google Analytics
67
Mimecast
66
SEO
Google Analytics
92
Mimecast
86
Composite
Google Analytics
74
Mimecast
73

Google Analytics outperforms Mimecast in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Mimecast leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Mimecast

Choose Mimecast when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2290 audited Google Analytics sites and 148 audited Mimecast sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Mimecast?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Mimecast?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Mimecast?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Mimecast (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Mimecast?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 86 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Mimecast?
Mimecast sites show lower Time to First Byte (263 ms vs 439 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Mimecast for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback