Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Miva

Based on 1870 and 3 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Miva details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsMivaWinner
Performance4160Miva
Accessibility8782Google Analytics
Best Practices8573Google Analytics
SEO9189Google Analytics
Security6477Miva
TTFB397ms1322msGoogle Analytics
Composite7380Miva
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Miva
60
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Miva
82
Security
Google Analytics
64
Miva
77
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Miva
89
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Miva
80

Google Analytics outperforms Miva in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 80). Miva leads in performance, security, composite score.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Miva

Choose Miva when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1870 audited Google Analytics sites and 3 audited Miva sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Miva?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Miva sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (60 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Miva?
Miva sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Miva?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 82). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Miva?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Miva?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (397 ms vs 1322 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Miva for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Miva scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback