Based on 1905 and 26 real audits
| Metric | Google Analytics | Nativo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 28 | Google Analytics |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | Nativo |
| Best Practices | 85 | 81 | Google Analytics |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | Google Analytics |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 401ms | 299ms | Nativo |
| Composite | 73 | 71 | Google Analytics |
Google Analytics outperforms Nativo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Nativo leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Nativo when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1905 audited Google Analytics sites and 26 audited Nativo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback