Skip to content

Google Analytics vs OpenSSL

Based on 1905 and 45 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View OpenSSL details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsOpenSSLWinner
Performance4145OpenSSL
Accessibility8786Google Analytics
Best Practices8585Tie
SEO9190Google Analytics
Security6464Tie
TTFB401ms524msGoogle Analytics
Composite7372Google Analytics
Performance
Google Analytics
41
OpenSSL
45
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
OpenSSL
86
Security
Google Analytics
64
OpenSSL
64
SEO
Google Analytics
91
OpenSSL
90
Composite
Google Analytics
73
OpenSSL
72

Google Analytics outperforms OpenSSL in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). OpenSSL leads in performance.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose OpenSSL

Choose OpenSSL when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1905 audited Google Analytics sites and 45 audited OpenSSL sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or OpenSSL?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, OpenSSL sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or OpenSSL?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or OpenSSL?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or OpenSSL?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or OpenSSL?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (401 ms vs 524 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or OpenSSL for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. OpenSSL scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback