Skip to content

Google Analytics vs parallax.js

Based on 2374 and 38 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View parallax.js details
MetricGoogle Analyticsparallax.jsWinner
Performance4246parallax.js
Accessibility8788parallax.js
Best Practices8792parallax.js
SEO9293parallax.js
Security6773parallax.js
TTFB455ms648msGoogle Analytics
Composite7477parallax.js
Performance
Google Analytics
42
parallax.js
46
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
parallax.js
88
Security
Google Analytics
67
parallax.js
73
SEO
Google Analytics
92
parallax.js
93
Composite
Google Analytics
74
parallax.js
77

parallax.js outperforms Google Analytics in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). Google Analytics leads in TTFB.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose parallax.js

Choose parallax.js when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2374 audited Google Analytics sites and 38 audited parallax.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or parallax.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, parallax.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 42 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or parallax.js?
parallax.js sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or parallax.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor parallax.js (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or parallax.js?
parallax.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or parallax.js?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (455 ms vs 648 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or parallax.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. parallax.js scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback