Skip to content

Google Analytics vs pickadate.js

Based on 1938 and 1 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View pickadate.js details
MetricGoogle Analyticspickadate.jsWinner
Performance4143pickadate.js
Accessibility8772Google Analytics
Best Practices8573Google Analytics
SEO9177Google Analytics
Security6569pickadate.js
TTFB406ms8567msGoogle Analytics
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Google Analytics
41
pickadate.js
43
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
pickadate.js
72
Security
Google Analytics
65
pickadate.js
69
SEO
Google Analytics
91
pickadate.js
77
Composite
Google Analytics
73
pickadate.js
73

Google Analytics outperforms pickadate.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). pickadate.js leads in performance, security.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose pickadate.js

Choose pickadate.js when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1938 audited Google Analytics sites and 1 audited pickadate.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or pickadate.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, pickadate.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (43 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or pickadate.js?
pickadate.js sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or pickadate.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 72). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or pickadate.js?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 77 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or pickadate.js?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (406 ms vs 8567 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or pickadate.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. pickadate.js scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback