Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Preact

Based on 1936 and 1 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Preact details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsPreactWinner
Performance4141Tie
Accessibility8789Preact
Best Practices85100Preact
SEO9192Preact
Security6571Preact
TTFB406ms855msGoogle Analytics
Composite7376Preact
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Preact
41
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Preact
89
Security
Google Analytics
65
Preact
71
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Preact
92
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Preact
76

Preact outperforms Google Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in TTFB.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Preact

Choose Preact when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1936 audited Google Analytics sites and 1 audited Preact sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Preact?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Preact?
Preact sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Preact?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Preact (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Preact?
Preact sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Preact?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (406 ms vs 855 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Preact for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback