Based on 1905 and 9 real audits
| Metric | Google Analytics | Prototype | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 42 | Prototype |
| Accessibility | 87 | 75 | Google Analytics |
| Best Practices | 85 | 85 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 85 | Google Analytics |
| Security | 64 | 63 | Google Analytics |
| TTFB | 401ms | 403ms | Google Analytics |
| Composite | 73 | 70 | Google Analytics |
Google Analytics outperforms Prototype in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 70). Prototype leads in performance.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Prototype when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1905 audited Google Analytics sites and 9 audited Prototype sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback