Based on 1893 and 95 real audits
| Metric | Google Analytics | Python | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 50 | Python |
| Accessibility | 87 | 91 | Python |
| Best Practices | 85 | 88 | Python |
| SEO | 91 | 93 | Python |
| Security | 64 | 67 | Python |
| TTFB | 400ms | 370ms | Python |
| Composite | 73 | 75 | Python |
Python outperforms Google Analytics in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in no categories.
Google Analytics doesn't clearly lead Python in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Python when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1893 audited Google Analytics sites and 95 audited Python sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback