Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Roistat

Based on 1938 and 1 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Roistat details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsRoistatWinner
Performance4159Roistat
Accessibility8771Google Analytics
Best Practices8581Google Analytics
SEO91100Roistat
Security6563Google Analytics
TTFB406ms671msGoogle Analytics
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Roistat
59
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Roistat
71
Security
Google Analytics
65
Roistat
63
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Roistat
100
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Roistat
73

Google Analytics outperforms Roistat in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Roistat leads in performance, SEO.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Roistat

Choose Roistat when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1938 audited Google Analytics sites and 1 audited Roistat sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Roistat?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Roistat sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (59 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Roistat?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Roistat?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 71). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Roistat?
Roistat sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Roistat?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (406 ms vs 671 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Roistat for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Roistat scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback