Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Rubicon Project

Based on 1905 and 28 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Rubicon Project details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsRubicon ProjectWinner
Performance4130Google Analytics
Accessibility8785Google Analytics
Best Practices8577Google Analytics
SEO9191Tie
Security6464Tie
TTFB401ms347msRubicon Project
Composite7371Google Analytics
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Rubicon Project
30
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Rubicon Project
85
Security
Google Analytics
64
Rubicon Project
64
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Rubicon Project
91
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Rubicon Project
71

Google Analytics outperforms Rubicon Project in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Rubicon Project leads in TTFB.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Rubicon Project

Choose Rubicon Project when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1905 audited Google Analytics sites and 28 audited Rubicon Project sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Rubicon Project?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Rubicon Project?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Rubicon Project?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Rubicon Project?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Rubicon Project?
Rubicon Project sites show lower Time to First Byte (347 ms vs 401 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Rubicon Project for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback