Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Screenfull.js

Based on 2271 and 1 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Screenfull.js details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsScreenfull.jsWinner
Performance4236Google Analytics
Accessibility8786Google Analytics
Best Practices86100Screenfull.js
SEO9285Google Analytics
Security6765Google Analytics
TTFB441ms685msGoogle Analytics
Composite7473Google Analytics
Performance
Google Analytics
42
Screenfull.js
36
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Screenfull.js
86
Security
Google Analytics
67
Screenfull.js
65
SEO
Google Analytics
92
Screenfull.js
85
Composite
Google Analytics
74
Screenfull.js
73

Google Analytics outperforms Screenfull.js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Screenfull.js leads in best practices.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Screenfull.js

Choose Screenfull.js when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2271 audited Google Analytics sites and 1 audited Screenfull.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Screenfull.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Screenfull.js?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Screenfull.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Screenfull.js?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Screenfull.js?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (441 ms vs 685 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Screenfull.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback