Skip to content

Google Analytics vs ScrollMagic

Based on 2073 and 26 real audits

MetricGoogle AnalyticsScrollMagicWinner
Performance4237Google Analytics
Accessibility8787Tie
Best Practices8684Google Analytics
SEO9191Tie
Security6667ScrollMagic
TTFB419ms472msGoogle Analytics
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Google Analytics
42
ScrollMagic
37
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
ScrollMagic
87
Security
Google Analytics
66
ScrollMagic
67
SEO
Google Analytics
91
ScrollMagic
91
Composite
Google Analytics
73
ScrollMagic
73

Google Analytics outperforms ScrollMagic in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). ScrollMagic leads in security.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose ScrollMagic

Choose ScrollMagic when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2073 audited Google Analytics sites and 26 audited ScrollMagic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or ScrollMagic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or ScrollMagic?
ScrollMagic sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or ScrollMagic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or ScrollMagic?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or ScrollMagic?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (419 ms vs 472 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or ScrollMagic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback