Based on 2026 and 10 real audits
| Metric | Google Analytics | spin.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 49 | spin.js |
| Accessibility | 87 | 85 | Google Analytics |
| Best Practices | 86 | 85 | Google Analytics |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | spin.js |
| Security | 65 | 61 | Google Analytics |
| TTFB | 414ms | 266ms | spin.js |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Google Analytics |
Google Analytics outperforms spin.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). spin.js leads in performance, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose spin.js when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2026 audited Google Analytics sites and 10 audited spin.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback