Skip to content

Google Analytics vs spin.js

Based on 1905 and 10 real audits

MetricGoogle Analyticsspin.jsWinner
Performance4149spin.js
Accessibility8785Google Analytics
Best Practices8585Tie
SEO9192spin.js
Security6461Google Analytics
TTFB401ms266msspin.js
Composite7372Google Analytics
Performance
Google Analytics
41
spin.js
49
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
spin.js
85
Security
Google Analytics
64
spin.js
61
SEO
Google Analytics
91
spin.js
92
Composite
Google Analytics
73
spin.js
72

Google Analytics and spin.js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Google Analytics has a composite score of 73 while spin.js scores 72.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose spin.js

Choose spin.js when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1905 audited Google Analytics sites and 10 audited spin.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or spin.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, spin.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or spin.js?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or spin.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or spin.js?
spin.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or spin.js?
spin.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (266 ms vs 401 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or spin.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. spin.js scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback