Skip to content

Google Analytics vs SuperPWA

Based on 1938 and 1 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View SuperPWA details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsSuperPWAWinner
Performance4167SuperPWA
Accessibility8794SuperPWA
Best Practices85100SuperPWA
SEO9192SuperPWA
Security6560Google Analytics
TTFB406ms693msGoogle Analytics
Composite7376SuperPWA
Performance
Google Analytics
41
SuperPWA
67
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
SuperPWA
94
Security
Google Analytics
65
SuperPWA
60
SEO
Google Analytics
91
SuperPWA
92
Composite
Google Analytics
73
SuperPWA
76

SuperPWA outperforms Google Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose SuperPWA

Choose SuperPWA when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1938 audited Google Analytics sites and 1 audited SuperPWA sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or SuperPWA?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, SuperPWA sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (67 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or SuperPWA?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or SuperPWA?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor SuperPWA (94 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or SuperPWA?
SuperPWA sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or SuperPWA?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (406 ms vs 693 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or SuperPWA for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. SuperPWA scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback