Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Timesact

Based on 2290 and 1 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Timesact details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsTimesactWinner
Performance4228Google Analytics
Accessibility8793Timesact
Best Practices86100Timesact
SEO9292Tie
Security6779Timesact
TTFB439ms132msTimesact
Composite7480Timesact
Performance
Google Analytics
42
Timesact
28
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Timesact
93
Security
Google Analytics
67
Timesact
79
SEO
Google Analytics
92
Timesact
92
Composite
Google Analytics
74
Timesact
80

Timesact outperforms Google Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 74). Google Analytics leads in performance.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Timesact

Choose Timesact when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2290 audited Google Analytics sites and 1 audited Timesact sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Timesact?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Timesact?
Timesact sites score higher on security analysis (79 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Timesact?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Timesact (93 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Timesact?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Timesact?
Timesact sites show lower Time to First Byte (132 ms vs 439 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Timesact for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback