Based on 1905 and 18 real audits
| Metric | Google Analytics | Tippy.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 40 | Google Analytics |
| Accessibility | 87 | 86 | Google Analytics |
| Best Practices | 85 | 84 | Google Analytics |
| SEO | 91 | 88 | Google Analytics |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 401ms | 311ms | Tippy.js |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Google Analytics outperforms Tippy.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Tippy.js leads in TTFB.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tippy.js when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1905 audited Google Analytics sites and 18 audited Tippy.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback