Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Typed.js

Based on 1805 and 1 real audits

MetricGoogle AnalyticsTyped.jsWinner
Performance4156Typed.js
Accessibility8788Typed.js
Best Practices8596Typed.js
SEO9191Tie
Security6461Google Analytics
TTFB382ms851msGoogle Analytics
Composite7272Tie
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Typed.js
56
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Typed.js
88
Security
Google Analytics
64
Typed.js
61
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Typed.js
91
Composite
Google Analytics
72
Typed.js
72

Typed.js outperforms Google Analytics in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Google Analytics leads in security, TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Typed.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Typed.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (56 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Typed.js?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 61 on average).
Should I choose Google Analytics or Typed.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Typed.js scores higher on performance while Google Analytics may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback