Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Underscore.js

Based on 1890 and 173 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Underscore.js details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsUnderscore.jsWinner
Performance4138Google Analytics
Accessibility8787Tie
Best Practices8583Google Analytics
SEO9190Google Analytics
Security6464Tie
TTFB400ms420msGoogle Analytics
Composite7372Google Analytics
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Underscore.js
38
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Underscore.js
87
Security
Google Analytics
64
Underscore.js
64
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Underscore.js
90
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Underscore.js
72

Google Analytics outperforms Underscore.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Underscore.js leads in no categories.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Underscore.js

Underscore.js doesn't clearly lead Google Analytics in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1890 audited Google Analytics sites and 173 audited Underscore.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Underscore.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Underscore.js?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Underscore.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Underscore.js?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Underscore.js?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (400 ms vs 420 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Underscore.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback