Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Underscore.js

Based on 2068 and 194 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Underscore.js details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsUnderscore.jsWinner
Performance4238Google Analytics
Accessibility8787Tie
Best Practices8684Google Analytics
SEO9190Google Analytics
Security6566Underscore.js
TTFB419ms434msGoogle Analytics
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Google Analytics
42
Underscore.js
38
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Underscore.js
87
Security
Google Analytics
65
Underscore.js
66
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Underscore.js
90
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Underscore.js
73

Google Analytics outperforms Underscore.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Underscore.js leads in security.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Underscore.js

Choose Underscore.js when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2068 audited Google Analytics sites and 194 audited Underscore.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Underscore.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Underscore.js?
Underscore.js sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Underscore.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Underscore.js?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Underscore.js?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (419 ms vs 434 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Underscore.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback