Based on 2160 and 450 real audits
| Metric | Google Analytics | Varnish | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 44 | Varnish |
| Accessibility | 87 | 89 | Varnish |
| Best Practices | 86 | 89 | Varnish |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 434ms | 202ms | Varnish |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Varnish outperforms Google Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Google Analytics leads in no categories.
Google Analytics doesn't clearly lead Varnish in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Varnish when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2160 audited Google Analytics sites and 450 audited Varnish sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback