Skip to content

Google Analytics vs Webpack

Based on 1890 and 955 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View Webpack details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsWebpackWinner
Performance4138Google Analytics
Accessibility8789Webpack
Best Practices8587Webpack
SEO9192Webpack
Security6466Webpack
TTFB400ms304msWebpack
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Google Analytics
41
Webpack
38
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
Webpack
89
Security
Google Analytics
64
Webpack
66
SEO
Google Analytics
91
Webpack
92
Composite
Google Analytics
73
Webpack
73

Webpack outperforms Google Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in performance.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Webpack

Choose Webpack when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1890 audited Google Analytics sites and 955 audited Webpack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or Webpack?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or Webpack?
Webpack sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or Webpack?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Webpack (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or Webpack?
Webpack sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or Webpack?
Webpack sites show lower Time to First Byte (304 ms vs 400 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or Webpack for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback