Skip to content

Google Analytics vs WP Fastest Cache

Based on 1936 and 1 real audits

View Google Analytics details | View WP Fastest Cache details
MetricGoogle AnalyticsWP Fastest CacheWinner
Performance4141Tie
Accessibility8785Google Analytics
Best Practices8596WP Fastest Cache
SEO91100WP Fastest Cache
Security6578WP Fastest Cache
TTFB406ms183msWP Fastest Cache
Composite7380WP Fastest Cache
Performance
Google Analytics
41
WP Fastest Cache
41
Accessibility
Google Analytics
87
WP Fastest Cache
85
Security
Google Analytics
65
WP Fastest Cache
78
SEO
Google Analytics
91
WP Fastest Cache
100
Composite
Google Analytics
73
WP Fastest Cache
80

WP Fastest Cache outperforms Google Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in accessibility.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose WP Fastest Cache

Choose WP Fastest Cache when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1936 audited Google Analytics sites and 1 audited WP Fastest Cache sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Analytics or WP Fastest Cache?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Analytics or WP Fastest Cache?
WP Fastest Cache sites score higher on security analysis (78 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Analytics or WP Fastest Cache?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Analytics or WP Fastest Cache?
WP Fastest Cache sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Analytics or WP Fastest Cache?
WP Fastest Cache sites show lower Time to First Byte (183 ms vs 406 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Analytics or WP Fastest Cache for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Google Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback