Based on 1989 and 16 real audits
| Metric | Google Analytics | wpBakery | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 37 | Google Analytics |
| Accessibility | 87 | 86 | Google Analytics |
| Best Practices | 86 | 82 | Google Analytics |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 65 | 64 | Google Analytics |
| TTFB | 425ms | 782ms | Google Analytics |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | wpBakery |
Google Analytics outperforms wpBakery in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 74). wpBakery leads in composite score.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
wpBakery doesn't clearly lead Google Analytics in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1989 audited Google Analytics sites and 16 audited wpBakery sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback