Skip to content

Google Cloud CDN vs Microsoft

Based on 102 and 2329 real audits

View Google Cloud CDN details | View Microsoft details
MetricGoogle Cloud CDNMicrosoftWinner
Performance3839Microsoft
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8686Tie
SEO9289Google Cloud CDN
Security6766Google Cloud CDN
TTFB217ms326msGoogle Cloud CDN
Composite7372Google Cloud CDN
Performance
Google Cloud CDN
38
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
Google Cloud CDN
89
Microsoft
89
Security
Google Cloud CDN
67
Microsoft
66
SEO
Google Cloud CDN
92
Microsoft
89
Composite
Google Cloud CDN
73
Microsoft
72

Google Cloud CDN outperforms Microsoft in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Microsoft leads in performance.

When to choose Google Cloud CDN

Choose Google Cloud CDN when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 102 audited Google Cloud CDN sites and 2329 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Cloud CDN or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Google Cloud CDN or Microsoft?
Google Cloud CDN sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Cloud CDN or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Cloud CDN (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Cloud CDN or Microsoft?
Google Cloud CDN sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Cloud CDN or Microsoft?
Google Cloud CDN sites show lower Time to First Byte (217 ms vs 326 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Cloud CDN or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while Google Cloud CDN may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback