Based on 15 and 1405 real audits
| Metric | Google Code Prettify | Google Font API | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 47 | Google Font API |
| Accessibility | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 91 | 88 | Google Code Prettify |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Google Font API |
| Security | 65 | 69 | Google Font API |
| TTFB | 367ms | 485ms | Google Code Prettify |
| Composite | 74 | 76 | Google Font API |
Google Font API outperforms Google Code Prettify in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Google Code Prettify leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose Google Code Prettify when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Font API when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 15 audited Google Code Prettify sites and 1405 audited Google Font API sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback