Based on 15 and 2938 real audits
| Metric | Google Code Prettify | Google Tag Manager | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 41 | Google Code Prettify |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | Google Tag Manager |
| Best Practices | 91 | 87 | Google Code Prettify |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Google Tag Manager |
| Security | 65 | 67 | Google Tag Manager |
| TTFB | 367ms | 421ms | Google Code Prettify |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Google Code Prettify and Google Tag Manager are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Google Code Prettify has a composite score of 74 while Google Tag Manager scores 74.
Choose Google Code Prettify when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 15 audited Google Code Prettify sites and 2938 audited Google Tag Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback