Skip to content

Google Code Prettify vs HSTS

Based on 14 and 2556 real audits

View Google Code Prettify details | View HSTS details
MetricGoogle Code PrettifyHSTSWinner
Performance4149HSTS
Accessibility8789HSTS
Best Practices9188Google Code Prettify
SEO9191Tie
Security6470HSTS
TTFB361ms364msGoogle Code Prettify
Composite7475HSTS
Performance
Google Code Prettify
41
HSTS
49
Accessibility
Google Code Prettify
87
HSTS
89
Security
Google Code Prettify
64
HSTS
70
SEO
Google Code Prettify
91
HSTS
91
Composite
Google Code Prettify
74
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms Google Code Prettify in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Google Code Prettify leads in best practices, TTFB.

When to choose Google Code Prettify

Choose Google Code Prettify when your primary concern is best practices and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 14 audited Google Code Prettify sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Code Prettify or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Code Prettify or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Code Prettify or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Code Prettify or HSTS?
Google Code Prettify sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Code Prettify or HSTS?
Google Code Prettify sites show lower Time to First Byte (361 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Code Prettify or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Google Code Prettify may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback