Based on 938 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Google Font API | Kadence WP Blocks | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 56 | Kadence WP Blocks |
| Accessibility | 87 | 100 | Kadence WP Blocks |
| Best Practices | 86 | 81 | Google Font API |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Kadence WP Blocks |
| Security | 64 | 60 | Google Font API |
| TTFB | 375ms | 105ms | Kadence WP Blocks |
| Composite | 73 | 77 | Kadence WP Blocks |
Kadence WP Blocks outperforms Google Font API in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). Google Font API leads in best practices, security.
Choose Google Font API when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Kadence WP Blocks when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 938 audited Google Font API sites and 1 audited Kadence WP Blocks sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback