Skip to content

Google Font API vs W3 Total Cache

Based on 938 and 1 real audits

View Google Font API details | View W3 Total Cache details
MetricGoogle Font APIW3 Total CacheWinner
Performance4374W3 Total Cache
Accessibility8787Tie
Best Practices86100W3 Total Cache
SEO9192W3 Total Cache
Security6460Google Font API
TTFB375ms1023msGoogle Font API
Composite7375W3 Total Cache
Performance
Google Font API
43
W3 Total Cache
74
Accessibility
Google Font API
87
W3 Total Cache
87
Security
Google Font API
64
W3 Total Cache
60
SEO
Google Font API
91
W3 Total Cache
92
Composite
Google Font API
73
W3 Total Cache
75

W3 Total Cache outperforms Google Font API in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Google Font API leads in security, TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Font API or W3 Total Cache?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, W3 Total Cache sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (74 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, Google Font API or W3 Total Cache?
Google Font API sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 60 on average).
Should I choose Google Font API or W3 Total Cache for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. W3 Total Cache scores higher on performance while Google Font API may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback