Skip to content

Google Maps vs Gravito

Based on 32 and 1 real audits

View Google Maps details | View Gravito details
MetricGoogle MapsGravitoWinner
Performance4019Google Maps
Accessibility8687Gravito
Best Practices9096Gravito
SEO9392Google Maps
Security7065Google Maps
TTFB367ms121msGravito
Composite7468Google Maps
Performance
Google Maps
40
Gravito
19
Accessibility
Google Maps
86
Gravito
87
Security
Google Maps
70
Gravito
65
SEO
Google Maps
93
Gravito
92
Composite
Google Maps
74
Gravito
68

Google Maps outperforms Gravito in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 68). Gravito leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.

When to choose Google Maps

Choose Google Maps when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Gravito

Choose Gravito when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 32 audited Google Maps sites and 1 audited Gravito sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Maps or Gravito?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Maps sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 19 on average).
Which has better security, Google Maps or Gravito?
Google Maps sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Maps or Gravito?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Gravito (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Maps or Gravito?
Google Maps sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Maps or Gravito?
Gravito sites show lower Time to First Byte (121 ms vs 367 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Maps or Gravito for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Maps scores higher on overall composite score while Google Maps may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback