Skip to content

Google Maps vs HSTS

Based on 27 and 2556 real audits

View Google Maps details | View HSTS details
MetricGoogle MapsHSTSWinner
Performance3949HSTS
Accessibility8689HSTS
Best Practices8988Google Maps
SEO9291Google Maps
Security6870HSTS
TTFB352ms364msGoogle Maps
Composite7475HSTS
Performance
Google Maps
39
HSTS
49
Accessibility
Google Maps
86
HSTS
89
Security
Google Maps
68
HSTS
70
SEO
Google Maps
92
HSTS
91
Composite
Google Maps
74
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms Google Maps in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Google Maps leads in best practices, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Google Maps

Choose Google Maps when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 27 audited Google Maps sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Maps or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Google Maps or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Maps or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Maps or HSTS?
Google Maps sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Maps or HSTS?
Google Maps sites show lower Time to First Byte (352 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Maps or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Google Maps may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback