Skip to content

Google Maps vs HSTS

Based on 106 and 3695 real audits

View Google Maps details | View HSTS details
MetricGoogle MapsHSTSWinner
Performance5254HSTS
Accessibility8690HSTS
Best Practices9090Tie
SEO9392Google Maps
Security7774Google Maps
TTFB1077ms423msHSTS
Composite7978Google Maps
Performance
Google Maps
52
HSTS
54
Accessibility
Google Maps
86
HSTS
90
Security
Google Maps
77
HSTS
74
SEO
Google Maps
93
HSTS
92
Composite
Google Maps
79
HSTS
78

Google Maps and HSTS are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Google Maps has a composite score of 79 while HSTS scores 78.

When to choose Google Maps

Choose Google Maps when your primary concern is security and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 106 audited Google Maps sites and 3695 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Maps or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, Google Maps or HSTS?
Google Maps sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 74 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Maps or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Maps or HSTS?
Google Maps sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Maps or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (423 ms vs 1077 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Maps or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Google Maps may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback