Skip to content

Google Maps vs Locomotive Scroll

Based on 47 and 2 real audits

View Google Maps details | View Locomotive Scroll details
MetricGoogle MapsLocomotive ScrollWinner
Performance4841Google Maps
Accessibility8481Google Maps
Best Practices9288Google Maps
SEO9384Google Maps
Security7370Google Maps
TTFB812ms287msLocomotive Scroll
Composite7774Google Maps
Performance
Google Maps
48
Locomotive Scroll
41
Accessibility
Google Maps
84
Locomotive Scroll
81
Security
Google Maps
73
Locomotive Scroll
70
SEO
Google Maps
93
Locomotive Scroll
84
Composite
Google Maps
77
Locomotive Scroll
74

Google Maps outperforms Locomotive Scroll in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). Locomotive Scroll leads in TTFB.

When to choose Google Maps

Choose Google Maps when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Locomotive Scroll

Choose Locomotive Scroll when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 47 audited Google Maps sites and 2 audited Locomotive Scroll sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Maps or Locomotive Scroll?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Maps sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Google Maps or Locomotive Scroll?
Google Maps sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Maps or Locomotive Scroll?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Maps (84 vs 81). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Maps or Locomotive Scroll?
Google Maps sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Maps or Locomotive Scroll?
Locomotive Scroll sites show lower Time to First Byte (287 ms vs 812 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Maps or Locomotive Scroll for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Maps scores higher on overall composite score while Google Maps may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback