Skip to content

Google Maps vs Microsoft

Based on 40 and 2465 real audits

View Google Maps details | View Microsoft details
MetricGoogle MapsMicrosoftWinner
Performance4539Google Maps
Accessibility8689Microsoft
Best Practices9186Google Maps
SEO9389Google Maps
Security7267Google Maps
TTFB798ms329msMicrosoft
Composite7673Google Maps
Performance
Google Maps
45
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
Google Maps
86
Microsoft
89
Security
Google Maps
72
Microsoft
67
SEO
Google Maps
93
Microsoft
89
Composite
Google Maps
76
Microsoft
73

Google Maps outperforms Microsoft in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Microsoft leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Google Maps

Choose Google Maps when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 40 audited Google Maps sites and 2465 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Maps or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Maps sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Google Maps or Microsoft?
Google Maps sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Maps or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Maps or Microsoft?
Google Maps sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Maps or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (329 ms vs 798 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Maps or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Maps scores higher on overall composite score while Google Maps may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback