Skip to content

Google Maps vs Open Graph

Based on 27 and 3415 real audits

View Google Maps details | View Open Graph details
MetricGoogle MapsOpen GraphWinner
Performance3945Open Graph
Accessibility8689Open Graph
Best Practices8987Google Maps
SEO9292Tie
Security6866Google Maps
TTFB352ms365msGoogle Maps
Composite7474Tie
Performance
Google Maps
39
Open Graph
45
Accessibility
Google Maps
86
Open Graph
89
Security
Google Maps
68
Open Graph
66
SEO
Google Maps
92
Open Graph
92
Composite
Google Maps
74
Open Graph
74

Google Maps outperforms Open Graph in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Open Graph leads in performance, accessibility.

When to choose Google Maps

Choose Google Maps when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 27 audited Google Maps sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Google Maps or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Google Maps or Open Graph?
Google Maps sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Google Maps or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Google Maps or Open Graph?
Google Maps sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Google Maps or Open Graph?
Google Maps sites show lower Time to First Byte (352 ms vs 365 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Google Maps or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Google Maps may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback