Based on 27 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Google Maps | Surfside | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 46 | Surfside |
| Accessibility | 86 | 91 | Surfside |
| Best Practices | 89 | 92 | Surfside |
| SEO | 92 | 100 | Surfside |
| Security | 68 | 76 | Surfside |
| TTFB | 352ms | 313ms | Surfside |
| Composite | 74 | 82 | Surfside |
Surfside outperforms Google Maps in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (82 vs 74). Google Maps leads in no categories.
Google Maps doesn't clearly lead Surfside in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Surfside when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 27 audited Google Maps sites and 1 audited Surfside sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback