Based on 73 and 3 real audits
| Metric | Google Maps | WP Google Map Plugin | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 46 | Google Maps |
| Accessibility | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 93 | 96 | WP Google Map Plugin |
| SEO | 94 | 94 | Tie |
| Security | 75 | 73 | Google Maps |
| TTFB | 912ms | 763ms | WP Google Map Plugin |
| Composite | 79 | 79 | Tie |
Google Maps and WP Google Map Plugin are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Google Maps has a composite score of 79 while WP Google Map Plugin scores 79.
Choose Google Maps when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose WP Google Map Plugin when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 73 audited Google Maps sites and 3 audited WP Google Map Plugin sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback