Based on 18 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Google Maps | WP Google Map Plugin | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 13 | Google Maps |
| Accessibility | 85 | 83 | Google Maps |
| Best Practices | 89 | 92 | WP Google Map Plugin |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | WP Google Map Plugin |
| Security | 62 | 56 | Google Maps |
| TTFB | 331ms | 1854ms | Google Maps |
| Composite | 71 | 70 | Google Maps |
Google Maps outperforms WP Google Map Plugin in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 70). WP Google Map Plugin leads in best practices, SEO.
Choose Google Maps when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose WP Google Map Plugin when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 18 audited Google Maps sites and 1 audited WP Google Map Plugin sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback