Based on 14 and 3415 real audits
| Metric | Google Optimize | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 45 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 83 | 89 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 82 | 87 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 87 | 92 | Open Graph |
| Security | 64 | 66 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 366ms | 365ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 71 | 74 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms Google Optimize in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). Google Optimize leads in no categories.
Google Optimize doesn't clearly lead Open Graph in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 14 audited Google Optimize sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback