Based on 1 and 3890 real audits
| Metric | Google PageSpeed | Google Search Console | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 51 | 44 | Google PageSpeed |
| Accessibility | 93 | 88 | Google PageSpeed |
| Best Practices | 92 | 86 | Google PageSpeed |
| SEO | 100 | 90 | Google PageSpeed |
| Security | 81 | 67 | Google PageSpeed |
| TTFB | 578ms | 346ms | Google Search Console |
| Composite | 82 | 73 | Google PageSpeed |
Google PageSpeed outperforms Google Search Console in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (82 vs 73). Google Search Console leads in TTFB.
Choose Google PageSpeed when your primary concern is security and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Google PageSpeed sites and 3890 audited Google Search Console sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback