Based on 179 and 118 real audits
| Metric | Google Play app | Native app preferred | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 37 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | Google Play app |
| Best Practices | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| SEO | 93 | 92 | Google Play app |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 228ms | 302ms | Google Play app |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Google Play app outperforms Native app preferred in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Native app preferred leads in no categories.
Choose Google Play app when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Native app preferred doesn't clearly lead Google Play app in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 179 audited Google Play app sites and 118 audited Native app preferred sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback